Posts by Plucky Sausagecup

. said:

Plucky Sausagecup said:

Yes, I remember. And he looked like Tom Cruise too.

Did he also run the troll moniker Ilookliketomcruise?

. said:

See also: 85 percent of the women on Leo Laporte's shows. Some of them are "real" nerds, but many of them are selling their looks to desperate fucking losers.

I can't think of the names, but I remember one is some kind of fucking model who runs a website on photography (laugh,) who comes on TWIT to discuss tech. Yeah, she's a legitimate tech person to listen to.



Here's an example of some of the women who have been on TWIT Live (Leo's show.)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/2791469627_4451ae6a88.jpg

"I just had new ROM installed in my computer. Do you want my opinion on DRM? I just read an article about it in Parade Magazine, tee hee!"

\

. said:

If you go to openx86 or whatever there are all these 2000 entry posts... I just want a nice description of what:

- motherboard with onboard sound and ethernet
- which CPU (hell if I understand Intel chips anymore series7 socket7 dualcore quad whatnot)
- nice quality videocard

works together out of the box for snowleopard.

but they don't have anything... all this "install kext and this bluemango backend and 8gb usb drive and blahblahblah".

Why can't it be simple?

. said:

What ever happened to those actors in Will and Grace?

FUCK THE PAIN AWAY said:

FUCK THE PAIN AWAY said:

. said:

Can you spare a colon, brother?
\
http://www.zewg.net/dump/photo/dasbutbro.gif

CANT STOP LAUGHING

That is some funny shit.

. said:

Belief in the existence of one is fine too. It's when you start using this belief to make claims about things like evolution which contradict the empirical evidence that there's a problem.

Mythos and logos.

. said:

http://www.nasa.gov/

Are those number standard or metric?

. said:

You are stupid. That's a claim which can be empirically tested.

kirby said:

Wow, you are one hypocritical democRAT!

First you were blaming bush, now you're blaming Reagen, the president that hasn't been in office for just almost about 20 years.

Golly gee, when will you go on to say it's all Nixon's fault?

. said:

What you just described is not a fundamentalist point of view, and I was addressing fundamentalists such as Dawkins. Yes, it is ridiculous to make the definitive claim that there is no deity. Lacking belief in one is a different thing altogether. The distinction is subtle but crucial.

THANK YOU!

We don't know that the center of the moon doesn't have a nougatine filling. Fundamentalists are quick to dismiss a valid theory that hasn't been disproven.

. said:

It's because he blames the earthquake on moving tectonic plates, and not God or Sin...Good point, most Chrisitans believe in science too (at least the non-fundie, non-televangelist, believers of the non-Catholic/non-fundamental dogmas)

This Dawkins clown should have a response written to his article that challenges his own theories, and that he cannot prove God doesn't exist, when even measured science, under all scientific scrutiny will show you that the majority of western society believes in "A God" or "Supreme being" and his narrow views are contradictory to the real factual statistics and proof God exists, quite simple because if people say it's true, then it's accepted as being truth despite what he proves.

Hawkins is a hypocrite and attentionwhore and shows us scientists are as "glass half broken" as economists. They've been screeching for years but they can't even accurately predict tomorrows weather..but they know what will happen 50-100 years from now. Speaking of which almost every futurist (with the exception of a handful) has been wrong, from prediction to scientific testing.

This is quality stuff, man.
Do you post over at hannity.com by chance?

. said:

So? It's not like atheists don't try to impose their views also.

True. But at least they don't knock on your door in the middle of a jack-off session to tranny porn.