F2 Navigation   |  Options  |  Login  |  Register  |  Status  |  FAQ  |  Upload Pics  |  Normal Mode Bookmark and Share


Posts by bensa

Page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 Next

 Timestamp Post 
9/5/2009 4:57 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:That's not a citing of the statute, you dumb rube, that's a newspaper article's interpretation of the statute. You're relying on a reporter's reading of a law as proof. Give me the statute and let me read it. Further, as I said before, any statute that prohibits or addresses negligence for behavior is known as "negligence per se", and there are several defenses against it. But keep thinking that you're living in the Wild Wild West - one day it will bankrupt you.




Sec. 83.001. CIVIL IMMUNITY [AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE]. A [It
is an affirmative defense to a civil action for damages for personal
injury or death that the] defendant who uses force or[, at the time
the cause of action arose, was justified in using] deadly force that
is justified under Chapter 9 [Section 9.32], Penal Code, is immune
from civil liability for personal injury or death that results from
the defendant's [against a person who at the time of the] use of
force or deadly force, as applicable [was committing an offense of
unlawful entry in the habitation of the defendant].


9/5/2009 4:55 am

View Thread

View Post
africans and Mexicans are on notice!

Joe Horn showed a couple of Mexican speaking african burglars not to fucking steal shit too.

The uppity africans tried to protest in a white only neighborhood and were met with one of the most awesome counter-african protests ever.

Made me proud watching these race baiting african muslim black panther fucks fear for their lives.

This video is awesome. The video starts out with the camera man saying "Thats it?" he is talking about the dozen africans walking up the street. The street where 1000 white people are waiting to fucking yell at them


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEZ9s0ZBAu8
9/5/2009 4:49 am

View Thread

View Post
Sec. 83.001. CIVIL IMMUNITY [AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE]. A [It
is an affirmative defense to a civil action for damages for personal
injury or death that the] defendant who uses force or[, at the time
the cause of action arose, was justified in using] deadly force that
is justified under Chapter 9 [Section 9.32], Penal Code, is immune
from civil liability for personal injury or death that results from
the defendant's [against a person who at the time of the] use of
force or deadly force, as applicable [was committing an offense of
unlawful entry in the habitation of the defendant].
9/5/2009 4:48 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:First off, don't call me a african. I'm a white man, and those are fighting words. Second, counselor, please give me a link to the statute and I WILL read the law and tell you if you got it right. And here's something we learn in law school: there are exceptions to EVERYTHING. If the statute "prevents" litigation, it does so under the concept of negligence per se, which of course has exceptions.



You are a african because you don't know what you are talking about

"The new law will also provide civil immunity for a person who lawfully uses deadly force in any of the circumstances spelled out in the bill. Police and prosecutors can still press charges if they feel deadly force was illegally used, legislative sponsors said."

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/texassouthwest/stories/032807dntexcastle.241e482.html
9/5/2009 4:44 am

View Thread

View Post
. said: :lol:

Are you serious? First off, you're Australian, right? What the fuck do you know about American tort law? Civil and criminal law are two seperate and distinct entitites. They have NO baring on one another. Their laws are completely different, their vocabulary is completely different. Just because you don't get charged for a criminal act does not mean you are exempt from being hit with a civil claim for the very same act. See OJ Simpson v. Gold. But go ahead, arm-chair lawyers, tell me I'm wrong. I mean, I only have a law degree. You guys probably watch "Law and Order". Me = :mittens:



Hey fucking african,

The Texas Castle Doctrine prohibits litigation by surviving families against the defender. Read the law, understand the law.

You said you were a lawyer?



We have this shit in Texas figured out, african!
9/5/2009 4:39 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:And you don't know shit about tort litigation. But please do continue explaining to me (a lawyer) how the remaining living mexicans and the relatives of the dead ones aren't getting several solicitations from lawyers advising them on their rights to file claims against the kids. And then tell me how they won't play a game of chicken with the kid's home owner's insurance company and take this right up to the point of trial, then settle.



Hey fucking african,

The Texas Castle Doctrine prohibits litigation by surviving families against the defender. Read the law, understand the law.

You said you were a lawyer?

:lol:

We have this shit in Texas figured out, african!
9/5/2009 4:37 am

View Thread

View Post
bensa said:http://www.kvue.com/video/local-index.html?nvid=395584

Video link above



The roommate who was not home at the time, the dude with the beard in the story, man he is a grifter!

The other dudes carrying the guitars are the roommates at home during the shooting, they look more normal.

Pretty wild shit. If that dude with the beard was at home at the time, he would have chopped their heads off I bet!
9/5/2009 4:32 am

View Thread

View Post
http://www.kvue.com/video/local-index.html?nvid=395584

Video link above
9/5/2009 4:25 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:i wake up in the middle of the night and see a mexishit coming in my door with a pistol, i'm unloading 13 rounds of .40 S&W into his chest.

texas will back me up, that's why we passed the fucking law, for situations exactly like this.



The report I saw on TV said that the dying robber unloaded his pistol too. Emptied the magazine blindly into the walls and furniture. Too late though because the college guy retreated back to his room to reload. That is the key. Retreat. If you show that you used deadly force and retreated at the earliest chance to avoid more carnage, the DA will pat you on the back.
9/5/2009 4:23 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Mexicans are some of the worst pedos and rapists around



Yep. Thats why the Mexican Community hates them so much. Murdering or beating others is OK in their lifestyle. It is very accepted. Being a pedo is not. They will stone them to death.

Also, Mexicans treat their children like gold till about the age of 5. Once they stop being cute, the adults completely ignore them and allow them to go feral. They are on their own from there on out.
9/5/2009 4:20 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Means nothing. If the prosecutor thinks that all the elements aren't satisfied and he's pressured by the community, he'll take it to a grand jury at least. As for civil litigation, criminal law means nothing - criminal findings are totally irellevant. These kids WILL need lawyers. I'm not saying they'll get convicted of anything, but they're going to have to spend some money to make sure everything goes as it should. And then there's the wrongful death suits to follow - "castle docterine" is a criminal statute, it has nothing to do with torts. That's why its always best to do absolutley nothing unless you are certain to die. Want my wallet african even though I could kill you with my bare hands? Here you go. You want to sucker punch me in a bar? Ok, I'm not getting up until the police show. This is how you must operate in America today.



Castle Doctrine addresses the issues of killing an intruder including civil litigation. You think a jury in that part of Texas between Austin and San Antonio is going to side with some deadbeat fuckstain mexishit robbers? Fuck no.

:lol:

These killings send a message to robbers and burglars across Texas. You will get your fucking ass shot!
9/5/2009 4:18 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Read some of the comments from the article. Growing up in NM and West Texas, they have a strong law and order attitude.



Many Texas can only dream of plugging a robber in their own home under the Castle Doctrine. The comments so far are pro-gunowner. That will change once the robber friends start to chime in.
9/5/2009 4:17 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:i love the quote at the end by the mexishit student "Alejandro Salazar"



I'm sure there will be a candlight protest or some shit. But it will be pretty tame. Even Feral Mexicans understand that breaking into someone's home is a big no-no. There is no justification in Mexican Society for that. Mexicans don't have many rules or code to follow. Probably the only ones involve respecting your mother, not harming children and not robbing people in their homes. You violate that shit and all Mexicans will turn their back on you. Otherwise, in regards to other laws, they dont give a shit. Stealing, drugs, whoring, they dont mind a bit.
9/5/2009 4:14 am

View Thread

View Post
I just wonder what the teenagers were doing at that college students home. The students are regular white dudes, they did not have any money or drugs. The only thing that saved their lives was that the one roommate had a loaded pistol ready to go. The others had a shotgun each but only for bird hunting.

Roommate turned on a light, saw one of the Mexicans with a pistol, the Mexican pointed it at him, roommate turned off light and started fucking firing on the Mexicans. He knew that there were only bad guys in front of him and his roommates rooms were behind him.
9/5/2009 4:10 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Well, I hope those kids have money, because they're about to go to trial, both criminal and civil. But I guess its better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. Fucked up world we live in when a man can't defend himself in his own home without having to worry about getting sued for doing so.



In Texas, you are protected under the Castle Doctrine.

The one who escaped uninjured was charged with robbery.

The college student used a Glock .40 loaded with Hydra-Shok rounds.
9/5/2009 4:03 am

View Thread

View Post
4 mexishits from fucking Luling, Texas attempted a home invasion robbery on 3 Texas State college students asleep in their home. One of the roommates who was awoken to the Mexican teens crashing through the front door grabbed a pistol and fucking emptied it into the 4 robbers! 2 bad guys died, one is in bad shape and will probably die, the fourth who never made it in the front door ran away but was later caught.

The students are in the Kappa Alpha Order, a fraternity founded by Robert E. Lee. They do all that old south stuff, wave the Rebel Battle Flag and sing songs about Dixie, constantly. Good for them killing these fucks!



http://www.kvue.com/news/top/stories/090509kvuesanmarcos-bkm.14b51c63b.html

A fatal San Marcos shooting may fall under the castle doctrine. Two Luling teens are dead, one is in the hospital and another is in jail.

Early Friday morning crime scene tape surrounded a home just a couple blocks away from Texas State University. Police say it's the result of a home invasion robbery carried out by four Luling teenagers.

"Three of the suspects were armed, one with a handgun, two with what we were later to find out were pellet guns, but very realistic looking,” San Marcos Police Chief Howard Williams said.

San Marcos Police Chief Howard Williams says the teens burst inside the home. There were three people inside; a college student, and two men, one of which was armed.

"He opened his bedroom door. When he did, one of the suspects in his living room pointed a weapon at him. He fired on the suspects in his house,” Williams said.

Two 16-year-olds died, another is now at Brackenridge Hospital with serious injuries. Williams says 17-year-old Frank Castro escaped uninjured, but is now in jail charged with aggravated robbery.

A roommate who was not home at the time and did not give his name says the men involved are taking it really hard.

"Physically they're okay mentally not so well,” he said.

Police will now see if this falls under the castle doctrine. It gives homeowners the right to defend themselves with deadly force. It's fairly new on the law books and not everyone agrees with it.

"I would be freaked out if someone came into my home and I don't know if they’re going to rape me shoot me, yeah. I can see where the homeowners are coming from,” Texas State student Kate Harris said.

"I'm sure it was in self-defense, but I'm very against that because they took two lives and who knows if this kid in the hospital is going to survive,” student Alejandro Salazar said.

Police say they do not anticipate filing any charges on the shooter. Castro is in jail with a $50,000 dollar bond.
9/5/2009 3:49 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:It was such a good idea to give stingers to those muds, almost as smart as giving nukes to Pakistan.



Stinger batteries have a short shelf life. Under 2 years. The batteries look like coffee cans. You cannot recharge them in the field. That's why all the attacks using manpads are French or Soviet models. I think this was attempted against a Jew Airline in some fucked up African country a few years ago.

A DHL aircraft was hit with a manpad on final to Baghdad a few years ago too.

Dont know much about them as it is not my field of knowledge.

Anti-tank, yes. Anti-aircraft no.
9/4/2009 4:22 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:you said before that you carried concealed.



Not coming home from work, stopping on the way home in a grocery store parking lot.
9/4/2009 3:59 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Fuckin' beaners don't know how to do anything right.



He robbed a grocery store. I was in a bad mood that day too.
9/4/2009 3:55 am

View Thread

View Post
Plucky Sausagecup said:Who are you and what did you do with bensa? The real bensa could break a man's neck with a single thumb. Too sweaty my ass.



I tried but he was just too sweaty after running. He was a stocky Mexican and slippery. It was hard to even get him in a sleeper hold. If I had a brick handy I would have just smashed his temple in. But one was not handy. 20 fucking minute long brawl. I'm rusty.

I got my hand on his chin a number of times to break his neck he just would not cooperate.
9/4/2009 3:49 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Wow. Another keyboard kommando on the internet, threatening to kill me.

Tell you what, son, post your name and address, right here, and let's see if we can set that up. You being such a fearless killer and all, I'm sure you're not afraid of doing that.

Oh, and if you think riot police didn't fight back when protests got out of hand, you're living in a dreamworld. Which isn't much of a surprise :lol:



I tried to kill a man in June. He was too sweaty to get a good grip around his neck to break it.

After he got out of the jail ward at Parkland Hospital, he was moved to the Dallas County Jail, where he sits at this very moment awaiting his next court date later this month.
9/4/2009 3:47 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Remember Kent State? :rofl:

That wised them up a bit.



That was the fucking National Guard. The difference between the NG or Reserves and Active Duty is like night and day.

Active Duty soldiers are a different animal. They would never have fired on civilians like that or taken the initiative to do so. That is why active duty soldiers should never be used in the civilan world. They are trained professional killers and work on a different set of rules than the civilan world. They cannot do civilian police or civilian humanitarian shit.

I think Eisenhower used active duty troops to kick the shit out of Mississippi or Arkansas NG. The NG did not want any of that shit.
9/4/2009 3:36 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:More talk, backed up by no action. Even peace fags had the balls to confront the cops when they protested the Iraq War. Republicans try to pick fights, get their asses kicked, and run off to the hospital begging for Medicare and whining that someone actually fought back.



Huh? Peace fags had "balls" because they knew that the other side would not fight back. You want to see fighting? Pretty sure you don't. I for one, play for keeps. I only know how to kill and destroy people in fights. None of this gay MMA wrestling shit. I break necks.
9/4/2009 3:34 am

View Thread

View Post
What would the US Armed Forces do? Sit on their hands? Liberals cannot even fight back. They would need a Revolutionary Guard or Waffen SS political arm to maintain control. The regular military would need to be neutered so it had no power.

Obama knows nothing of the military. Nothing. He could never command troops in the field. Could you imagine him on a horse directing the order of battle?

:lol:

Bush could do it.
9/4/2009 3:19 am

View Thread

View Post
1. I will guard everything within the limits of my post and quit my post only when properly relieved.

2. I will obey my special orders and perform all of my duties in a military manner.

3. I will report violations of my special orders, emergencies, and anything not covered in my instructions to the commander of the relief.


That's it. You follow that shit to the fucking letter and you cannot get shit on. In Basic Training they test your ass constantly on these 3 General Orders. They try and trip you up, all the fucking time.


All you have to do is become a mindless robot and follow orders. Just like Forrest Gump. Don't think for yourself, the Army will do it for you.

As long as you have good officers and good NCOs, you are in good shape.
 

Page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 Next