F2 Navigation   |  Options  |  Login  |  Register  |  Status  |  FAQ  |  Upload Pics  |  Normal Mode Bookmark and Share


Posts by bensa

Page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 Next

 Timestamp Post 
9/20/2010 4:27 am

View Thread

View Post
yari II said:Bullshit. I have used a large BearVault canister for a week long hike and was able to fit all food, hygene products, first aid kit and trash in it for the entire week.



All your food and all your trash...for a whole fucking week? That right there is fucking bullshit of the highest order. Not possible.
9/20/2010 4:26 am

View Thread

View Post
yari II said:Bear canisters are the method of control required in most areas with real bear problems.

If you think you are safe because you strictly adhere to your rules, you are kidding yourself. It certainly can't hurt but, these are wild animals we are talking about here, there are no garauntees. None.



If you keep all your food out of the bear triangle and keep all your smellables in a bear bag on a bear cable, there is no fucking way a bear will even come near your campsite. Bears are smart. They wont wander in like a dog, checking just to make sure. No fucking way. They just move on. Seen this happen dozens of times. I have lived outside, in a tent for 3 summers. Camping out basically about 150 nights. In bear country. No bear ever fucked with me. Because I followed the bear rules. Not human rules regarding bears. But the rules that bears live by when they are out wandering around.

Note: My rules are for black bears. Not grizzly. I have no idea what grizzlys are capable of.
9/20/2010 4:19 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:You're right. When you're in the backcountry, you put all that crap into the canister, or you don't take it anyway.

The canisters that you take along work, that's why you take them! Bear bags might work in AZ, but certainly not the eastern Sierra.



Bear canisters are not big enough to store all your smellables. It is a cardinal sin to leave anything that food touches, sitting out.
9/20/2010 4:13 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Don't know, the bear boxes I used this weekend seemed to do the job. It was a real problem about 10 years ago, and now the bears are much less of a problem at the campground.

Can't speak for the backcountry though, haven't used the hanging thing for about 10 years. I've been carrying the canister going back there and haven't had a problem.



I had to google what a bear canister is. That is not enough. Anything that smells needs to go in a bear bag, plus all cooking gear including stoves. Sunscreen, bug repellent, eating utensils, chapstick. It must all go up in the bear bag. There is no room for discussion about this. None.

In addition, no food can ever come into contact with sleeping gear or tents. No food can be stored in a tent or eaten in a tent, ever. Not once. Even if you ate some stew in a tent 5 months ago, then wanted to take the tent to bear country. No. No fucking way.

I have camped around bears many many times. If you follow the food rules, you will not have any bear problems. Sumping food, sumping grey water is essential too.
9/20/2010 4:05 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Not really true, bears in the eastern Sierras have been able to get past that for years. The only thing that's been working there now are bear boxes (secured steel boxes at campgrounds) or bear canisters when you're backpacking.



I have seen black bears in New Mexico and Colorado break into bear proof dumpsters and bear boxes. Bear cables work great if they are up high and in between two good sized trees. Impossible for a bear to get a grip on braided steel cable like that. They will just move on.
9/20/2010 2:58 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:It also doesn't work with IE9, showing only the first page. The basic version works tho.



I have the same problem.
9/20/2010 1:31 am

View Thread

View Post
It would be very fun to have a 928, the same color as the Risky Business one. Use it to go and buy ice cream.
9/20/2010 1:25 am

View Thread

View Post
The 968 was pretty gay.
9/20/2010 1:23 am

View Thread

View Post
Why dont they put up permanent bear cables in campgrounds so that you can hoist up bear bags at night?

Bear cables work very well and impossible for bears to get into.

I have only seen one bear ever, above treeline, which in the Rockies is about 9800 feet. The only one I saw was in a saddle, it was commuting between two peaks from one valley to the next.
9/19/2010 8:19 pm

View Thread

View Post
In college some chick told me "You are not dateable, you are more the kind of guy I will eventually marry". I guess I was not up to her slut standards.

"You dress like my dad" was another one I got in college.

:lol:

Those chicks were losers anyway.
9/19/2010 2:51 pm

View Thread

View Post
Yes, it makes you realize how unoriginal Airplane really is. All they did was add some lines to the straight script to make it funny. When you watch the Youtube edit, you realize that the whole script for Airplane was probably jotted down on the back of a cocktail napkin.
9/19/2010 2:10 am

View Thread

View Post
Watch this and watch your jaw drop

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q__vuyH1JEI
9/19/2010 1:31 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:it's into the dickypedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Hour!

1957, bensa is right



Its pretty funny because they use Striker as the main guy.
9/19/2010 1:30 am

View Thread

View Post
This is the original movie

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Hour!

Not a bad movie. You will be shocked how much Airplane copied off of it.
9/19/2010 1:27 am

View Thread

View Post
7734 said:I remember the movie you are talking about -- 70's not 50's.



Has to be in the 50s. Late 50s. The actors are all 50s actors.

Not a bad movie. I think they are trying to fly east to west to Vancouver.

Alot of well known actors in it, black and white. Identical to Airplane.
9/19/2010 1:21 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:The kissing businessmen are in the first 10 minutes. If they leave them in, chances are pretty good that the movie is really unedited.



The tits, when they say they have run out of Sanka. That is how you know if it is unedited.
9/19/2010 1:17 am

View Thread

View Post
Airplane is a spoof of some other film from the 50s. TMC showed the original film about a month ago. It was interesting because the film was straight. Airplane was a total spoof of it and made the original look so odd. The original happened in Canada. Food poisoning etc.
9/18/2010 5:21 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:That's one of the most pathetic wikis I've ever seen.

:lol:



You are owned. Dumbass. How could you not know about the famine. Are you really this stupid?
9/18/2010 5:19 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:I'm sure you have a link for that, troll.



I do african, check a few posts up!

You really are pathetic, you fucking commie african jew.
9/18/2010 5:18 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:The Russians were doing all the fighting too. Your spam and Studebakers didn't make the Red Army what it was.

By 1945 the Russians needed no ones help.




:lol:

Without American trucks, the Russians WOULD STILL be walking towards Germany. Still!
9/18/2010 5:17 am

View Thread

View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Famine_of_1947

:lol:

Communists forget about the famine. Totally forgotten in history books.
9/18/2010 5:14 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:The Russians had plenty of food by 1945. They truly were a scary and efficient force by the end of the war. All of the Allied leaders except for old drunk speech maker Churchill knew that testing the soviets in 1945 was a really bad idea. Then the Brits turfed the fat fart out on his ass.



In 1946, millions of Soviet citizens starved to death from a failed wheat crop.
9/18/2010 5:05 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Are you really going to compare US artillery to the soviets? Really? The Russians had ten to one numerical superiority and they were very good at it after years of practice. Their tanks were much much better and more numerous than what the americans had. And bitch please, the ppsh was a better gun than the Thompson, it isn't really an argument. They also had the SKS by 1945.

The mustang was matched by the Yak-3 and Yak-9 quite well. The la-7 was far better than the mustang .

All the US had was the B-29, that's it. They were out matched in every other arena in 1945 except at sea which was totally irrelevant in Central Europe.



Much of their material was given to them by the Americans. Their trucks and tooling machinery were American. Bust up the machinery in the factories and the Soviets were fucked.
9/18/2010 5:03 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Why would it be the same cold war lines if the Red Army was essentially cut off and surrounded in Central Europe? They would have been pushed back out of Warsaw Pact countries. With no logistical support the red army would have been slaughtered. Patton's Third Army conducted maneuver tank warfare and could have led such an effort. He understood the flaws of Soviet style attrition warfare and was always working to outflank the enemy.



You dont understand how the Soviet Army works. There was no surrender allowed. Soldiers were just cogs in the machine. No fucking going backward. Only forward. No retreating allowed.

The Soviets would have just dug in where they were and starved to death, ate dirt and sticks, waiting and waiting. They would not leave. Where would they go. So many of them were fucking released prisoners or peasants. They were trash.
9/18/2010 5:00 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:You're an idiot. The Red Army was battle hardened and very efficient by the end of 1943



:lol:

They lost millions of soldiers in the last year of the war!

How many lives did they lose just taking Berlin? 100,000+ killed, 300,000 wounded. Germans lost 100,000 and 125,000 civilians were killed taking the city. Not efficent at all.
 

Page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 Next