The Jews are doing to the WASPS what we've been doing to everyone else for three hundred years. I am not saying it's right, but obviously whites have lost their edge and suffer the consequences they shall.
Either way, though, to blame one's failures on some obscure Jew conspiracy is goofy.
The trouble with you two is that you are both so obsessed with extreme positions in this debate, that neither of you can see the happy medium where you're supposed to be. Marriage IS a sham, as the divorce rate (which is understated because it excludes the separations) shows. But that doesn't mean you should avoid all female contact either.
What you need is to have fuck buddies, or friends with benefits. That way you get all the sex and companionship you could ever need or want, but you also get the advantage of being able to jump out and spend time on your own whenever you like, and you get a partner who is 100% honest with you all the time (which doesn't happen in marriage, no matter how much you'd like to believe it). That's really the way to go if you want a satisfying relationship.
Years ago, the WASPS successfully protected their kind. Hell, they were responsible for kicking the movie jews out of new york and the jews set up hollywood as a result.
The Jews have an edge over the WASPS for the same reason the WASPS had an edge over everyone else in the 19th century: the Jews are smarter.
The ability for such a small population of people to control most of the nodes of global information dispersal is incredible.
The Jews adapted and boy are the kicking our fucking asses.
Who said anything about stability? HINT: With more than half of marriages failing, marriage is hardly stable either. If you want stability, become a sockfucker like IE. If you want anything else, you're going to have to be prepared to lose something along the way.
He said that a few months ago. Apparently he has some workbench in his house where he is crafting some comic-book device. Look, I am really an optimist and I would love to see IE hit a home run with cold fusion or something.
Then again, IE argued with me and nearly threatened me with death, along with Mag Bas, when I insisted that humanity will never put a human on Mars.
Quite the opposite. I'm arguing AGAINST the extreme position - the position that women are responsible for everything that's wrong with marriage.
Go back to my first post in this thread. I say that the negative traits that many of these betas apply to females are actually applicable to humanity as a whole.
The issue I have with these threads are the angry single guys who place the blame for all their own insecurities and shortcomings on half of humanity, instead of taking responsibility for their faults and putting effort into changing them.
Posted 2/9/2010 7:26 am
Women-firsters (who are both men and women) are killing marriage--the goose that lays the golden eggs for women.
Chivalrist men run biased courts which ass-rape men in divorce. The chivalrists like to think that they are the "good, real men" defending women from all the other "bad, abusive men." Thus, most of the individual men in power freely screw over men as a group.
Feminists of course pump out anti-male propaganda which appeals both to chivalrist men and those women who are happy to accept any rationalization for women being put first and advantaged in any situation.
Then there are those women (who are legion) that seem normal but when put in a situation of temptation where it is totally in their power whether to be fair or whether to completely screw over a man for their own advantage, are able to rationalize away doing their absolute worst to the man to get as much as they can for themselves out of the situation. Divorce is the primary example of this.
Men and women who genuinely care about real fairness--in practice rather than theory--are thin on the ground.
Marriage to a more successful man is the golden goose that allows the majority of women to have the freedom to balance work and family life to their liking, with a financial safety net under them no matter what their choice.
The current radically anti-male state of divorce is like killing that goose to get more eggs while getting rid of the unwanted goose. It doesn't work in the long term and scares men off from marrying in the first place. It's the same with no one caring about the falling numbers of men in college. Who are the college educated women going to marry up to? They are already complaining about it.
Of course feminists are in denial that the majority of women don't WANT to commit to working full time for life to support themselves and so are also in denial that hurting men ends up hurting women too.
People aren't willing to put forth the effort. You don't hunt down the "perfect woman" and marry her. Your marriage isn't the same on day 1 as it is on year 10. People change, relationships change and it takes hard work to keep it stable.
What surprises me most is that men will spend less time deciding on a wife then they will a business partner.
I have no love for feminists, but if you are in a good marriage none of this matters. Your relationship with your spouse is a two-party arrangement. Outside forces shouldn't be involved.
The same thing I dislike about these betas blaming everything on women and not taking responsibility for their own actions. Feminists do the same thing, but in reverse.
